Back to issue
Cover of: Behavioral Antitrust and Merger Control
Gregory J. Werden, Luke M. Froeb, Mikhael Shor

Behavioral Antitrust and Merger Control

Section: Articles
Volume 167 (2011) / Issue 1, pp. 126-142 (17)
Published 09.07.2018
DOI 10.1628/093245611794656426
  • article PDF
  • available
  • 10.1628/093245611794656426
Due to a system change, access problems and other issues may occur. We are working with urgency on a solution. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Summary
Scholarship on competition policy has begun to explore the implications of learning from behavioral research and to challenge the assumption of profit maximization at the heart of neoclassical economic theory of the firm. This scholarship is briefly reviewed, focusing on merger control. Prospects for basing merger control entirely on data from actual mergers or laboratory experiments are explored. Also explored are implications of behavioral research for merger assessment in consumer-goods industries. The conclusion is that competition policy should continue to rely on neoclassical economic analysis based on the assumption of profit maximization. (JEL: K21, L41)