Back to issue
Cover of: Bias in Choice of Law: New Empirical and Experimental Evidence
Daniel Klerman

Bias in Choice of Law: New Empirical and Experimental Evidence

Section: Conference Article 2
Volume 179 (2023) / Issue 1, pp. 32-50 (19)
Published 31.01.2023
DOI 10.1628/jite-2023-0003
  • article PDF
  • available
  • 10.1628/jite-2023-0003
Due to a system change, access problems and other issues may occur. We are working with urgency on a solution. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Summary
Scholars have argued that modern American choice of law is subject to three biases: (1) a bias in favor of residents of the forum state (pro-resident bias), (2) a bias in favor of plaintiffs (pro-plaintiff bias), and (3) a bias in favor of the law of the forum (forum-law bias). This article brings new evidence about these biases from a comprehensive database of vehicular accident cases and from the first experiment related to choice of law. Overall, there is some evidence of a proresident bias in state (but not federal) court, some evidence of pro-plaintiff bias in both federal and state court, and no evidence of a forum-law bias.