Back to issue
Cover of: Centralised Labour Market Negotiations: Strategic Behaviour Curbs Employment
Julia Müller, Thorsten Upmann

Centralised Labour Market Negotiations: Strategic Behaviour Curbs Employment

Section: Articles
Volume 174 (2018) / Issue 2, pp. 278-302 (25)
Published 05.07.2018
DOI 10.1628/093245617X14930170168706
  • article PDF
  • available
  • 10.1628/093245617X14930170168706
Due to a system change, access problems and other issues may occur. We are working with urgency on a solution. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Summary
This paper contributes to the analysis of centralised versus decentralised labour market negotiations. Applying the familiar Nash bargaining solution, we show that centralised negotiations lead to a lower employment level but to a higher wage rate than decentralised labour market bargaining. While this is an important theoretical result on its own, it has important effects for both empirical labour market research and labour market policies. Also, this result counters the critique that efficient negotiations result in employment levels exceeding the competitive level.