Back to issue
Cover of: Constraints on Private Benefits of Control: Ex Ante Control Mechanisms versus Ex Post Transaction Review
Alan Schwartz, Ronald J. Gilson

Constraints on Private Benefits of Control: Ex Ante Control Mechanisms versus Ex Post Transaction Review

Section: Articles
Volume 169 (2013) / Issue 1, pp. 160-183 (24)
Published 09.07.2018
DOI 10.1628/093245613X660537
  • article PDF
  • available
  • 10.1628/093245613X660537
Due to a system change, access problems and other issues may occur. We are working with urgency on a solution. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Summary
We ask how to regulate pecuniary private benefit consumption. These benefits can compensate controlling shareholders for monitoring managers and investing effort in implementing projects. Controlling shareholders may consume excessive benefits, however. We argue (a) ex post judicial review of controlled transactions dominates ex ante restrictions on the controlled structures: the latter eliminate efficiencies along with abuses of the controlled company form; (b) controlling shareholders should be permitted to contract with investors over private benefit levels. Both work with better courts. Hence, we recommend creating a European-level corporate court, whose jurisdiction parties can invoke by contract.