Back to issue
Cover of: Economic Analysis of Taking Rules: The Bilateral Investment Case
Daniel Göller, Michael Hewer

Economic Analysis of Taking Rules: The Bilateral Investment Case

Section: Articles
Volume 170 (2014) / Issue 3, pp. 520-536 (17)
Published 09.07.2018
DOI 10.1628/093245614X13958185385442
  • article PDF
  • available
  • 10.1628/093245614X13958185385442
Due to a system change, access problems and other issues may occur. We are working with urgency on a solution. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Summary
Our analysis focuses on a situation where a landowner and the government invest prior to the government's taking decision. When the government suffers from budgetary fiscal illusion, optimal compensation equals the hypothetical value of the landowner's property had she invested efficiently. In contrast, under a government that maximizes social welfare, this regime may fail to induce the first best. This insight stands in contrast to the literature, e.g., Miceli (1991), where this regime has been shown to induce the socially optimal solution.