Program
Subjects
Works
Book Types
Back to issue
Cover of: Epilog, Ouvertüre oder Intermezzo? Zur ursprünglichen Funktion von 2 Clem 19,1–20,4
Wolfgang Grünstäudl

Epilog, Ouvertüre oder Intermezzo? Zur ursprünglichen Funktion von 2 Clem 19,1–20,4

Section: Articles
Volume 4 (2013) / Issue 2, pp. 242-260 (19)
Published 09.07.2018
DOI 10.1628/186870313X13667164610039
  • article PDF
  • available
  • 10.1628/186870313X13667164610039
Due to a system change, access problems and other issues may occur. We are working with urgency on a solution. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Summary
2 Clem 19.1–20.4, probably a later addition to 2 Clem 1–18.2; 20.5, bears striking intertextual links to 1 Clem. This points to the original function of this passage: It served as some sort of bridge-text between the public reading of 2 Clem 1–18.2; 20.5 and 1 Clem. Because of this, 2 Clem 19.1–20.4 witnesses an early combination of two formerly independent texts, i.e.1 Clem and 2 Clem.