Back to issue
Cover of: Fiscal Adjustment under Centralized Federalism: Empirical Evaluation of the Response to Budgetary Shocks
Jørn Rattsø

Fiscal Adjustment under Centralized Federalism: Empirical Evaluation of the Response to Budgetary Shocks

Section: Articles
Volume 60 (2004) / Issue 2, pp. 240-261 (22)
Published 09.07.2018
DOI 10.1628/0015221041525750
  • article PDF
  • available
  • 10.1628/0015221041525750
Due to a system change, access problems and other issues may occur. We are working with urgency on a solution. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Summary
Fiscal federalism implies a challenge of holding fiscal discipline at the local level. Recent analyses of fiscal adjustment have addressed the design of fiscal and political institutions for the U.S. states, and have shown how tax limits and anti-deficit rules strengthen immediate shock adjustment. Here we extend the evidence to the case of centralized financing in Norway. In this system central government takes a larger responsibility in smoothing decentralized government revenue, but at the same time the localities are more vulnerable to shocks because of their limited room to maneuver. The empirical analysis of responses to budgetary shocks shows that local public investment is the main shock absorber in this system and that investments are procyclical. Local fiscal crisis is avoided, but decentralized government is destabilizing.