Back to issue
Cover of: German Guilt, White Guilt: The Politics of Reforestation and the Return of the Gardening State
Johannes Becke

German Guilt, White Guilt: The Politics of Reforestation and the Return of the Gardening State

Section: Articles
Volume 27 (2020) / Issue 3, pp. 225-239 (15)
Published 14.09.2020
DOI 10.1628/jsq-2020-0016
  • article PDF
  • available
  • 10.1628/jsq-2020-0016
Due to a system change, access problems and other issues may occur. We are working with urgency on a solution. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Summary
This response puts Tzuberi's analysis into a broader comparative context. First, the post-1990 attempt to create Jews in the image of the liberal-secular German nation-state met considerable resistance by the Central Council of Jews in Germany. In addition, the majority of post-Soviet Jews showed no interest in liberal Jewish theology or the fantasy of reviving the German-Jewish past. Second, the milieu of Judaizing Germans (core architects of German-Jewish revivalism) shows a strong resemblance to other attempts of escaping colonial whiteness, including patterns of what has been called »ethnic fraud.« Third, in comparison to other cases of minority repatriation, the German practice of expiatory demographic engineering was relatively cost-intensive, but contributed considerably to the country's »nation re-branding« after reunification. Fourth, the German politics of reforestation vis-à-vis its Jewish community points to the rise of a post-migratory »gardening state,« heavily invested in regulating its diverse population through a policy mix of migration, education and surveillance.