Back to issue
Cover of: Is Adam Smith Liberal?
Elias L. Khalil

Is Adam Smith Liberal?

Section: Articles
Volume 158 (2002) / Issue 4, pp. 664-694 (31)
Published 09.07.2018
DOI 10.1628/0932456022975222
  • article PDF
  • available
  • 10.1628/0932456022975222
Due to a system change, access problems and other issues may occur. We are working with urgency on a solution. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Summary
Smith's theory of authority is nonliberal both in the classical liberal sense of Locke and Buchanan and in the social liberal sense of Bentham and Marx. Smith distinguishes civil contract from political contract: While the state protects rights à la civil contract, its differentia specifica is the political contract, which involves authority and allegiance. Allegiance is neither an involuntary act nor the product of choice à la civil contract. Allegiance characterizes the enlistment of low-rank agents in the service of high-rank agents whose station is desired. For Smith, admiration of the powerful is the origin of political order – which is a nonliberal view.