Back to issue
Cover of: Law versus Norms: The Impact of Human-Rights Treaties on National Bills of Rights
Mila Versteeg

Law versus Norms: The Impact of Human-Rights Treaties on National Bills of Rights

Section: Article
Volume 171 (2015) / Issue 1, pp. 87-111 (25)
Published 09.07.2018
DOI 10.1628/093245615X14204441572731
  • article PDF
  • available
  • 10.1628/093245615X14204441572731
Due to a system change, access problems and other issues may occur. We are working with urgency on a solution. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Summary
The constitutional incorporation of international human-rights law is often seen as one of the most powerful ways in which treaty norms can be enforced at the local level. This paper examines empirically if and how human-rights treaties alter rights commitments in national constitutions. Analyzing the adoption of 103 constitutional rights – only some of which are enshrined in treaties – in 188 countries over a sixty-one-year period, the paper finds that the impact of human-rights treaties on a country's menu of constitutional rights is limited. In some cases, treaty ratification even results in the adoption of fewer constitutional rights.