Back to issue
Cover of: Moral Hazard and Clear Conscience
Topi Miettinen

Moral Hazard and Clear Conscience

Section: Article
Volume 167 (2011) / Issue 2, pp. 224-235 (12)
Published 09.07.2018
DOI 10.1628/093245611796589960
  • article PDF
  • available
  • 10.1628/093245611796589960
Due to a system change, access problems and other issues may occur. We are working with urgency on a solution. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Summary
The paper studies theoretically how the optimal contract in the hidden-action moral-hazard model is affected when an agent feels bad when not reaching a target effort set in the contract. In equilibrium, the agent's effort falls short of the target, inducing guilt, which must be compensated by a higher financial reward. Thus, although the principal's payoff is higher, the agent receives a part of the monetary rents accruing to intrinsic motivation. This result differs markedly from previous contributions on contracting under social preference or pro-social motivation.