Back to issue
Cover of: Multiunion Bargaining: Tariff Plurality and Tariff Competition
Christian Wey, Hamid Aghadadashli

Multiunion Bargaining: Tariff Plurality and Tariff Competition

Section: Articles
Volume 171 (2015) / Issue 4, pp. 666-695 (30)
Published 09.07.2018
DOI 10.1628/093245615X14302136524833
  • article PDF
  • available
  • 10.1628/093245615X14302136524833
Due to a system change, access problems and other issues may occur. We are working with urgency on a solution. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Summary
We study (efficient) sequential bargaining between two unions and a single firm. If unions are perfectly substitutable (tariff competition), then there is a first-mover advantage and the second union is foreclosed. If unions are perfectly complementary (tariff plurality), then there is a second-mover advantage, so that the first union's wage bill is smaller than the second union's. If unions represent worker groups each producing a differentiated good, then overemployment (underemployment) occurs when goods are substitutable (complementary). Unions merge when workers are substitutable but stay separate when they are complementary, so that the inefficiencies associated with craft unionism persist.