Back to issue
Cover of: Optimal Taxation When the Tax Burden Matters
Davud Rostam-Afschar, Robin Jessen, Maria Metzing

Optimal Taxation When the Tax Burden Matters

Section: Articles
Volume 78 (2022) / Issue 3, pp. 312-340 (29)
Published 01.07.2022
DOI 10.1628/fa-2022-0004
  • article PDF
  • available
  • 10.1628/fa-2022-0004
Due to a system change, access problems and other issues may occur. We are working with urgency on a solution. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Summary
Survey evidence shows that the magnitude of the tax liability plays a role in value judgements about which groups deserve tax breaks. We demonstrate that the German taxtransfer system conflicts with a welfarist inequality averse social planner. It is consistent with a planner who is averse to both inequality and high tax liabilities. The tax-transfer schedule reflects non-welfarist value judgements of citizens or non-welfarist aims of policy makers. We extend our analysis to several European countries and the USA to show that their redistributive systems can be rationalized with an inequality averse social planner for whom the tax burden matters.