Back to issue
Cover of: Organizational Forms and Measurement Costs
Yoram Barzel

Organizational Forms and Measurement Costs

Section: Articles
Volume 161 (2005) / Issue 3, pp. 357-373 (17)
Published 09.07.2018
DOI 10.1628/093245605774259291
  • article PDF
  • available
  • 10.1628/093245605774259291
Due to a system change, access problems and other issues may occur. We are working with urgency on a solution. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Summary
Under caveat emptor, buyers effect their measurements prior to exchange. Long-term relations and contracts allow buyers to measure commodities at consumption. Buyers use subjective measurements in long-term relations. Contractual guarantees shift enforcement to the state, but require objective, verifiable measurements. Most exchange agreements combine the two forms and benefit from the comparative advantage that each provides. Vertical integration reduces excessive measurement because employees gain little from manipulating commodities and information about them. The capture of quasi rent from specialized assets is just a manifestation of difficult-to-measure entities. The notion of measurement cost is more general and more operational than that of specific assets.