Back to issue
Cover of: Preferences over Punishment and Reward Mechanisms in Social Dilemmas
Dominik Matzat, Martin G. Kocher

Preferences over Punishment and Reward Mechanisms in Social Dilemmas

Section: Article
Volume 172 (2016) / Issue 1, pp. 163-194 (32)
Published 09.07.2018
DOI 10.1628/093245616X14500948554072
  • article PDF
  • available
  • 10.1628/093245616X14500948554072
Due to a system change, access problems and other issues may occur. We are working with urgency on a solution. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Summary
The existing results from literature on preferences over sanctions in social dilemmas are inconclusive. Our experimental setup allows us to study both preferences over punishment and reward mechanisms and preferences over their levels of effectiveness. We show that the voluntary contribution mechanism (VCM) with reward is the most favored and the most efficient institution, although the VCM with punishment leads to higher contributions. Subjects prefer extreme values of the sanctioning technologies, and contributions increase in the level of effectiveness. There is no difference in the voting pattern between a partner- and a strangermatching treatment.