Back to issue
Cover of: Reexamining Drug Regulation from the Perspective of Innovation Policy
Rebecca S. Eisenberg

Reexamining Drug Regulation from the Perspective of Innovation Policy

Section: Articles
Volume 160 (2004) / Issue 1, pp. 126-135 (10)
Published 09.07.2018
DOI 10.1628/093245604773861168
  • article PDF
  • available
  • 10.1628/093245604773861168
Due to a system change, access problems and other issues may occur. We are working with urgency on a solution. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Summary
The patent system typically takes credit for motivating biopharmaceutical innovation by making it profitable, while drug regulation gets blamed for burdening innovation with bureaucratic costs and delays. But FDA regulation in fact promotes profitability by prolonging exclusivity in product markets and by protecting against parallel imports. Firms may prefer FDA-administered exclusivities to expanded patent protection because they protect product markets without also adding to R&D costs. FDA-administered exclusivities may also face fewer legal and political obstacles than expanded patent protection, although as pressure mounts to constrain the rising costs of drugs, the political environment is changing.