Back to issue
Cover of: Second Kings 24–25 and Jeremiah 52 as Diverging and Converging Memories of the Babylonian Conquest
Sonja Ammann

Second Kings 24–25 and Jeremiah 52 as Diverging and Converging Memories of the Babylonian Conquest

Section: Articles
Volume 10 (2021) / Issue 1, pp. 11-29 (19)
Published 15.06.2021
DOI 10.1628/hebai-2021-0003
  • article PDF
  • available
  • 10.1628/hebai-2021-0003
Due to a system change, access problems and other issues may occur. We are working with urgency on a solution. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Summary
The accounts of the Babylonian conquest of Jerusalem in Jeremiah 52 and 2 Kings 24:18–25:30 are virtually identical and seem to convey a unified memory of this historical event. However, a closer examination of the Hebrew and Greek texts reveals that these nearly identical accounts are the result of a longer process of textual changes. The unified memory on the surface conceals an underlying pluriformity of memories. A comparison between the account in 2 Kings 24:18–25:30 and the parallels in Jeremiah can thus serve as a case study on how the Babylonian conquest was construed as a cultural trauma in ancient Israel's collective memory.