Back to issue
Cover of: Shareholder Protection and Outside Blockholders: Substitutes or Complements?
Sergey Stepanov

Shareholder Protection and Outside Blockholders: Substitutes or Complements?

Section: Articles
Volume 169 (2013) / Issue 2, pp. 355-381 (27)
Published 09.07.2018
DOI 10.1628/093245613X666315
  • article PDF
  • available
  • 10.1628/093245613X666315
Due to a system change, access problems and other issues may occur. We are working with urgency on a solution. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Summary
Should outside blockholders be more common in countries with weaker shareholder protection? I show that there can be a U-shape dependence of the outside ownership concentration on the quality of shareholder protection. This result is in line with the recent empirical evidence questioning the traditional law-and-finance view. In my model, a lower cost of private benefit extraction makes outside monitoring less desirable for an entrepreneur, thereby calling for a smaller outside blockholder's share. However, a low blockholder's share may provoke collusion between the entrepreneur and the blockholder, which hampers raising funds from dispersed shareholders. This trade-off yields the described U-shape relationship.