Back to issue
Cover of: Stipulated Damages as a Rent-Extraction Mechanism: Experimental Evidence
Kathryn E. Spier, Claudia M. Landeo

Stipulated Damages as a Rent-Extraction Mechanism: Experimental Evidence

Section: Articles
Volume 172 (2016) / Issue 2, pp. 235-273 (39)
Published 09.07.2018
DOI 10.1628/093245616X14534707121162
  • article PDF
  • available
  • 10.1628/093245616X14534707121162
Due to a system change, access problems and other issues may occur. We are working with urgency on a solution. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Summary
This paper experimentally studies stipulated damages as a rent-extraction mechanism. We demonstrate that contract renegotiation induces the sellers to propose the lowest stipulated damages and the entrants to offer the highest price more frequently. We show that complete information about the entrant's cost lowers exclusion of high-cost entrants. Unanticipated findings are observed. The majority of sellers make more generous offers than expected. Rent extraction also occurs in renegotiation environments. Our findings from the dictatorial-seller and buyer-entrant communication treatments suggest the presence of social preferences.