Cover of: The Sons of God and Daughters of Men and the Giants: Disputed Points in the Interpretation of Genesis 6:1–4
John Day

The Sons of God and Daughters of Men and the Giants: Disputed Points in the Interpretation of Genesis 6:1–4

Section: Articles
Volume 1 (2012) / Issue 4, pp. 427-447 (21)
Published 09.07.2018
DOI 10.1628/219222712805363944
  • article PDF
  • available
  • 10.1628/219222712805363944
Summary
This essay offers a comprehensive analysis of the many problems of interpretation in Gen 6:1–4. Although the Nephilim were the offspring of the sons of God and daughters of men in the underlying myth, contrary to a widely held view this is no longer the case in Gen 6:1–4, where they are already in existence at the time of the sexual liaisons. Even though 1 Enoch preserves the original notion of the origin of the Nephilim, the more elaborate story there is in general a later midrash on Gen 6:1–4, contrary to some recent suggestions. Genesis 6:1–4 is not based on Mesopotamian or Greek mythology but contains an Israelite myth utilizing and transforming Canaanite concepts. Not only do the heavenly sons of God derive ultimately from the Canaanite »sons of El,« but the name of the Canaanite giant Nephilim (literally »fallen ones«) is a retrospective term comparable to that of the giant Rephaim, a word originally used of the dead (Ugaritic rp'um), implying the giants have passed away. Contrary to some, v. 3 is an original part of the text; it indicates that the humans' descendants were in danger of becoming immortal as a result of the infusion of the divine spirit from the marriages. in this verse derives from a Hebrew verb, »to be strong.«