Back to issue
Cover of: Assigning Protection: Can Refugee Rights and State Preferences be Reconciled?
James C. Hathaway

Assigning Protection: Can Refugee Rights and State Preferences be Reconciled?

Section: Articles
Volume 175 (2019) / Issue 1, pp. 33-45 (13)
Published 19.12.2018
DOI 10.1628/jite-2019-0006
  • article PDF
  • available
  • 10.1628/jite-2019-0006
Due to a system change, access problems and other issues may occur. We are working with urgency on a solution. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Summary
The theoretically global responsibility to protect refugees is today heavily skewed, with just ten countries – predominantly very poor – hosting more than half of the world's refugee population. Refugee protection has moreover become tantamount to warehousing for most refugees, with roughly half of the world's refugees stuck in »protracted refugee situations« for decades with their lives on hold. Both concerns – the unprincipled allocation of responsibility based on accidents of geography and the desperate need for greater attention to resettlement as a core protection response – cry out for a global, managed system to protect refugees.